The best half-year in prime property belonged to the cities that could not build

Two terracotta paper columns on a warm sand ground, one narrow and tall and one broad and short, with a burnt-orange line running level across both

A waterfront that is being manufactured is, by definition, new supply. That makes the finding in this half-year index awkward and worth reading closely.

What the index found

Across the 30 cities tracked by the Savills World Cities Prime Residential Index, published 19 August 2026, prime capital values rose 0.6% in the six months to June and rents rose 1.1%. Sixty per cent of cities were stable or positive.

Who led, and why

Tokyo was the strongest market at 7.0% over six months and 20.4% over the year to June. Cape Town delivered 4.7% as limited prime stock continued to outpace demand; Seoul, 4.1%. Southern Europe — Lisbon, Madrid, Barcelona, Athens, Rome — was positive throughout, with Lisbon and Geneva both above 3.0%.

Who did not

Four of the five Chinese cities tracked recorded declines. Dubai, Berlin and Bangkok fell on both values and rents. For the second half of 2026 Savills forecasts a 0.5% average rise across the index, with Dubai the clear outlier at around -10%, attributed to oversupply and geopolitical uncertainty.

The stated rule

Savills’ own summary is that cities combining constrained supply, household wealth creation and sustained international demand outperform, and that those with elevated supply or heightened uncertainty lag. In the same period, prime yields were broadly stable, and the era of synchronised global growth is described as, for now, past.

The honest way to hold this against a manufactured waterfront is to separate two kinds of supply. Generic supply — another tower of the same apartment in the same corridor — is what a scarcity argument cannot survive, and it is what the Dubai forecast is about. Non-replicable supply is different: a beachfront plot on a specific frond is not made less scarce by a thousand apartments completing ten kilometres inland, because the buyer of one is not the buyer of the other. Tokyo and Cape Town are in the index precisely because their prime stock is of the second kind. What that means practically is that the useful comparison is never the citywide index; it is the number of directly substitutable properties, which on a single frond may be measured in dozens. The counterweight is timing. Non-replicable does not mean liquid, and an asset with few substitutes also has few buyers on any given month, so the exit is slow even when the scarcity argument holds. Anyone reading a global index for reassurance should take the supply finding seriously and then check the only figure that settles it locally — how many comparable units are due to complete within walking distance, and when.

Source: Savills checked against the source

More Palm Central news

Register interest